There are so many benefits of a completely end-to-end digital
home theater system. When you go through an analog connection, you’ve got to
convert the signal, and when the signal goes into a digital display, like a DLP
projector, you have to sample and re-digitize it, so there is a lot of loss
there. Image constraint is one way to create marketplace incentive to get
people to use these protected digital connections instead of analog connections.
But it’s not really powerful. The problem we face is that we can have all of
this protected content delivery, but all of that has to be converted to analog
because we have a lot of analog TVs that we have to feed. Since analog is not
self-protecting, there are a lot of very high-quality analog-to-digital
converters that can take the analog signal and make a very high-quality digital
signal out of that, with no protection, and no obligation to look at any rights
that are in that, which basically allows for unlimited copies and unlimited
redistribution over the internet. Say that the content in that case is escaping
through the analog hole. The idea is that we really need to find a way to manage
the rights with an analog signal to the equivalent means as if it had gotten
through a protected digital connection.
There is work going on to develop a
process by which an analog signal can carry copy control signals and
redistribution signals that would actually allow, in a standardized way, the
detection of those rights at the point of analog-to-digital conversion and then
trigger copy protection in the process of making a secure recording. We’re
working with the CE and IT industries to find a means for solving this
dilemma.
Q How do you respond to the person who says that the MPAA is so concerned with
piracy that they’re not thinking about the convenience of the consumer?
A Our
goal for copy protection is that it’s transparent to the honest user. When you
buy a DVD in a store and bring it home, you put it in your player and you don’t
really know that there’s copy protection. DVD was a success when it was
introduced because that copy protection allowed content owners to release
prerecorded media in a digital format without the fear that the content could be
perfectly copied and distributed.
In the last eight years, though, what we’ve
learned is that the current DVD copy protection system, CSS, is really a
first-generation digital copy protection system, and we all recognize that there
is a hack of it—but I think what we also recognize is that it’s pretty
restrictive in terms of allowing consumers to use content like they want to use
it today. Nine years ago we didn’t have media servers and portable video
devices, and the idea of locking content to a piece of plastic made a lot of
sense. It allowed us to launch a digital media format. Now we’re starting to
realize that we’ve got media center PCs and portable devices that store several
movies, so we must work on the next generation of content protection for both
prerecorded movies as well as recordable movies that facilitate things like a
managed copy onto a media server from a prerecorded disc, or the ability to
digitally move content from a disc onto a portable device. We’re already working
on amending the DVD license to provide new functionality like secure home
networking.
|